#BARWE215
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Inquiry Series
    • Current Year: '25-'26 School Year >
      • September: What is keeping us together, focused, and motivated to do this work in 2025?
      • October: Revisiting the Helms White Identity Model
      • November: Learning from White Anti-Racists of the Past
      • December: How can we identify and challenge white supremacy culture in ourselves and our institutions?
      • January: How can we create classroom culture that resists white supremacy and that nourishes Black joy?
    • Previous Inquiry Series
    • Inquiry Resources >
      • How to Start a BARWE Group
      • Norms
      • Problem of Practice Protocol
      • Discussion Protocols
      • Bringing in Coconspirators
      • Facilitators Troubleshooting Guide
  • Summer Events
  • Advocacy
    • Open Letter to Museum of American Revolution Leadership
    • Legal Defense for Philly Educators
  • Donate

Problem of Practice Protocol

A Problem of Practice Protocol we’ve used before that could be adapted for the purpose of the discussion outlined above:
Structure (adapted from YDEKC):
  1. Brainstorm: Take a few minutes to brainstorm a few dilemmas related to how performance of antiracism shows up in curriculum or relationships in your school or organization. While only one person will share, it is important for all of us to have the opportunity to identify something from our own experiences. You might refer back to the above list of ways performance may show up to spark ideas.
  2. Share Dilemma: One group member (i.e. the presenter) shares an overview of the dilemma they have faced. This should include a brief 2-5 minute summary of the dilemma and a framing question for the group. A framing question should be open-ended and solution-oriented. (e.g. “Given this parent feedback on my curriculum, how can I design lessons that are more relevant to all my students?”) 
  3. Questions: After silently listening, the other group members now ask both clarifying and probing questions. These questions serve to gather more information while also helping the presenter to think differently about the situation. Group members should avoid suggesting solutions at this stage. 
  4. Discussion: The group discusses the dilemma to more fully analyze it. They may also make suggestions to the presenter. At this stage, the presenter should avoid speaking and focus on actively listening. 
Presenter Response: The presenter responds to the discussion by summarizing what they heard, how it may be helpful, and how it has helped them evolve their thinking on the dilemma.
  • About Us
    • FAQ
  • Inquiry Series
    • Current Year: '25-'26 School Year >
      • September: What is keeping us together, focused, and motivated to do this work in 2025?
      • October: Revisiting the Helms White Identity Model
      • November: Learning from White Anti-Racists of the Past
      • December: How can we identify and challenge white supremacy culture in ourselves and our institutions?
      • January: How can we create classroom culture that resists white supremacy and that nourishes Black joy?
    • Previous Inquiry Series
    • Inquiry Resources >
      • How to Start a BARWE Group
      • Norms
      • Problem of Practice Protocol
      • Discussion Protocols
      • Bringing in Coconspirators
      • Facilitators Troubleshooting Guide
  • Summer Events
  • Advocacy
    • Open Letter to Museum of American Revolution Leadership
    • Legal Defense for Philly Educators
  • Donate